The basic principle of his claim is that workers in poor countries are underutilized. Citing the work of the development economist Michael Clemens, Caplan claims that global freedom of movement would increase the gross world product by between fifty and a hundred and fifty per cent. The difference between Caplan’s world and our own is that Caplan presents immigrants not as threats-to low-skilled workers, to social services, to public culture-but as generators of wealth. He envisions a future in which Democrats and Republicans vie to become the country’s “open border party,” each calling for nearly unrestricted immigration. In his view, immigration should be essentially unlimited. In a new graphic-nonfiction book, “ Open Borders: The Science and Ethics of Immigration,” Bryan Caplan, a libertarian economist at George Mason University, makes the radical pro-immigration argument that others don’t. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, for example, speaks to the question of how American borders are policed, not to whether they ought to be policed in the first place. Even immigration activists implicitly accept that it must be controlled: the movement to abolish U.S. Still, the ads’ underlying premise-that governments have a right to control entry into their countries-seems beyond dispute. Canada has mounted billboards in Hungary to deter Roma asylum seekers Germany has sponsored posters on the sides of Kabul buses Norway has purchased Facebook ads targeted at young men from Afghanistan, Ethiopia, and Eritrea whose profiles indicate interest in “travelling” or “Europe.”Īctivists and observers have criticized the hostile tone of these ad campaigns. The Department of Homeland Security has distributed similar flyers at migrant shelters in Mexico, near the border: “The next time you try to cross the border without documents, you could end up a victim of the desert,” they warn. The multimedia effort, which has been lauded by President Trump, featured bold, red text-“ NO WAY: YOU WILL NOT MAKE AUSTRALIA HOME”-over images of dark, choppy seas. ![]() In the past decade, the government of Australia spent more than fifteen million dollars on an advertising campaign designed to deter prospective migrants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |